logoalt Hacker News

jrowen • yesterday at 11:29 PM • 1 reply • view on HN

It's true though. It's not like math or software where you can do it isolation and work things out logically "on paper." I don't think the solution will be "put a bunch of agents on it and let them figure it out." The tools to model and observe what's going on in full detail don't exist. Far from it. You can't really optimize the trial and error feedback loop time.

I think it will look more like Claude just helping every expert along the way do their job better. Analyzing and synthesizing data to make better experimental suggestions and design new equipment (or totally new experiments based on unconceived-of apparatuses?). Managing the flow of information and building bespoke knowledge bases and tools. The more it is integrated into all the systems and researchers involved the faster it can put things together.

Although, on second thought, maybe there even is a near future where it takes our models and understanding and just galaxybrains a better model. Has anyone tried feeding it some collection of datasets and saying "can you make a more detailed model of a cell?"


Replies

bheztio • today at 12:20 AM

> You can't really optimize the trial and error feedback loop time.

Isn't this exactly what startups in this area are doing - automated experiments connected to AI. Of course at some stage things will "graduate" to human review but it still seems to have a lot of potential.

➕ show 1 reply