I've had the concern for years that AI users (or AI itself) will eventually consider non-AI users a pain, because humans will become inefficient in lots of workloads and management, sometimes causing things to come down to a screeching halt, relatively speaking.
We have to solidify laws protecting anti-AI-ers if that's their choice.
>We have to solidify laws protecting anti-AI-ers if that's their choice.
Protect them from what, exactly?
Market efficiency solves this. But whether that's healthy for society or not is an open question.
The same way as we protect those anti-internet or anti-electricity ?
[dead]
More likely the oligarchy will see them as an impediment to their trillion-dollar, world-consuming valuations: https://fortune.com/2026/10/28/openai-ceo-sam-altman-gen-z-d...
Which is actually much more dangerous.
This happens today with all technology. AI is no different. If your coworker refuses to use a computer or the internet there are no laws protecting them. Nor should there be.