alt Hacker NewsI can understand alphabetical ordering in some circumstances, but if the point is to indicate which model family is lighter or heavier, surely atomic numbers should be taken into account?!?
Argon - 18
Boron - 5
Carbon - 6
I don't think I'll be able to cope with this level of elemental disorder.
Replies
WithinReason • today at 5:39 PM
The naming is elementary, my dear Watson.
ahsillyme • today at 6:29 PM
I thought Carbon for composable stood well on it's own marketing. As did Argon, for impervious. Next to one another the pair comes off utterly cockeyed and sleazy.
It's gonna be even worse then they name the 11th iteration Potassium.