logoalt Hacker News

bitpush • today at 5:52 PM • 7 replies • view on HN

How is this any different than terra, sol etc or leopard, yosemite etc, or model x, y, 3, s ..


Replies

codessta • today at 5:58 PM

Don't know about the leopard and model x, but at least in the case of OpenAI luna > Terra > Sol > Astra is a pretty obvious size progression.

But I come from a latin language background, so maybe I'm a bit biased there.

➕ show 4 replies
itishappy • today at 7:17 PM

Astra > Sol > Terra > Luna seems clear enough to me

Leopard (10.5) and Yosemite (10.10) both came with clear version numbers

Model X and Model Y are siblings which do not have a clear hierarchical relationship

Gemini 4 Carbon and Gemini 4 Argon are rather difficult for me to tell at a glance

➕ show 1 reply
petu • today at 6:41 PM

Luna/Terra/Sol/Astra make perfect sense, it indicates model tier/size with larger celestial body representing larger model.

Same for Anthropic, consistent model tier naming reused across model generations.

Those are just like i3/i5/i7 or M-series Pro/Max/Ultra.

But Carbon seems to be full replacement of Argon announced two weeks ago, they're same price. So Argon doesn't mean anything, they just picked random element.

➕ show 2 replies
israrkhan • today at 6:35 PM

FYI, Model S, 3, X, Y is an acronym for S E X Y.

➕ show 3 replies
user43928 • today at 5:54 PM

Would it have been so hard to call it Gemini 4.1 or 4.5?

➕ show 1 reply
sauwan • today at 6:29 PM

terra/sol or opus/haiku give an indication of size (the sun is bigger than the earth, opus is larger than a haiku). Carbon is smaller than argon (periodic table speaking), so that's no longer a helpful way of thinking about the model sizes...