logoalt Hacker News

dosinga • today at 3:28 PM • 5 replies • view on HN

I think this is a case of a misleading headline. Do the 250K trees even enter into this:

> Police said that, based on current information, there have been irregularities and shortcomings in drainage and water management at the data centre project's worksite

250K trees sounds like a lot, but Finland has like 20B trees, so it would take 3 hours for Finland to grow this back


Replies

Arainach • today at 3:38 PM

> 250K trees sounds like a lot, but Finland has like 20B trees, so it would take 3 hours for Finland to grow this back

That's not how math.....or trees.....work.

➕ show 6 replies
delichon • today at 3:51 PM

  Growing stock volume: ~2.66B m^3
  Annual volume increment: 103M m^3
  Approximate number of trees: 20B
  Implied average tree volume: ~0.1275 m^3
  Volume of 250K trees: 250K x 0.1275 m^3 ~ 32K m^3

  Time for remaining trees to grow that volume back: 32K m^3 / 103M m^3/year ~ 0.00031 years ~ 2.7 hours
whatevaa • today at 3:35 PM

9 woman can't bring baby in a month. That 3 hour estimate makes no sense.

➕ show 2 replies
sampo • today at 4:06 PM

> 250K trees sounds like a lot

In this case, it's 3.3 sq-km (or 1.3 sq-miles) of forest.

gwjeglkefnf3 • today at 3:41 PM

What does the total number of trees in Finland have to do with the amount of time it would take to grow 250K tree back?

➕ show 1 reply