To be fair, the parent is excluding acquisitions:
> not including acquisitions
Of which only Chrome is in-house created. I wouldn't think Chrome brings in a lot of revenue, and these days I'd argue FF is a much better product.
I’m sure with Chrome, Google has smart people calculating the value of the data that they get from it. It doesn’t make money directly but it’s gotta be a huge money maker.
I wouldn't call Chrome an acquisition, but it wasn't birthed at Google.
As a FF user, I've had to fall back to Edge/Chrome many times because some obscure hospital telehealth portal or bank website or whatever has issues.
I want FF to be successful, but unfortunately it's not really up to Mozilla