> And that it's not for example a hardware failure?
They say they have a second site, the chance of hardware failure taking out both sites at the exact same time is near zero.
As I understand it, the second site will allow them to resume operating at a limited capacity sooner than 2-4 weeks?
Other than that 2-4 does sound more like hardware lead time rather than time it takes to resolve a security incident.
As I understand it, the second site will allow them to resume operating at a limited capacity sooner than 2-4 weeks?
Other than that 2-4 does sound more like hardware lead time rather than time it takes to resolve a security incident.