I'm a physicist and there is approximately zero chance no one uses AI in two years unless we're all dead. It's a world class mathematician and expert software developer with the capacity to research papers 100x faster than I can, which has given me (like most scientists, an okay programmer at best) to be able to test vastly more ideas and find useful papers etc far faster than I ever could before.

I'm guessing you don't have any tasks in your life that involve coding, math, science, or law if this is your view.

Is this sarcastic or authentic cope? I don't understand how people can still be in denial about LLMs this late in the game.

> Google

Is it not because they have been enshittifying Search for over a decade, then recently lost their de-facto monopoly on Search due to LLMs, with no good new product to show for it?