logoalt Hacker News

thrdbndndn • today at 9:45 AM • 1 reply • view on HN

Having both would be even better.

My current Android phone (Pixel 7) has both Face Unlock and an on-screen fingerprint scanner. My previous phone (a OnePlus) had Face Unlock along with a rear-mounted fingerprint reader, which was even better.

Unlocking a phone has never felt as effortless on my iPhones; after all these years, it continues to be a nuisance. Face ID is fine, but you have to hold the phone right in front of your face (and its angle sensitivity is far less forgiving than on my Android phones, where it recognizes you even at an angle--unlike the iPhone, where you practically have to hold it parallel to your face).

Plus, there are countless situations where you cannot or do not want to pick up your phone from a table just to align it with your face. In those cases, I am forced to type in my passcode, whereas an on-screen fingerprint scanner would be a billion times more convenient.

I am mostly baffled that such a "solved," trivial problem in the Android ecosystem continues to be a topic or a matter of "choice" on iPhones.


Replies

kalleboo • today at 12:24 PM

The excuse is usually that the Android face unlocks are very insecure and easy to trick since they just use a regular camera instead of the IR dot projector. I don't know how true this actually is though.

Same excuse behind not having under-screen fingerprint scanners - supposedly they're a lot easier to trick.