I wish AA benchmarked the models at the reasoning efforts people actual use them at. For example, it's very rare for people that I know to use the "max" reasoning setting - specially because Claude Code itself scares you away from using it. But all of these coding benchmarks are based on just that reasoning effort.
I get it, they can only benchmark so much. But I'd rather have a benchmark of how the model is actually used and offered to customers rather than the best case scenario for it.
The other reasoning levels are almost always benchmarked, AA just doesnt show them in the default charts.
Maybe you need to enable them in the filters, but AA is the best website I found with benchmarks numbers on all reasoning effort levels of recent frontier models.