logoalt Hacker News

samudrijan • yesterday at 3:19 PM • 4 replies • view on HN

And perpetuated the system. Iceland meanwhile let their banks fail,sent bankers to jail, took the medicine and came out stronger.


Replies

rtkwe • yesterday at 3:53 PM

Well the US nominally put in more safeguards against the same thing happening again. We've just dismantled them in record time and are moving on to those put in place after the 20s for some reason.

runarberg • yesterday at 4:13 PM

Icelander here. The banks were only temporarily nationalized, the plan was always to privatize them as soon as possible. Only a handful of bankers went to jail, their sentences were extremely light, and every single one of them returned to investing as soon as they were able (or even kept investing via family members while in prison). Today they are still the richest people in Iceland and own the majority of all assets.

I think the only reason Iceland nationalized the failed banks in the first place was because they had no other option, the economy is too small, and they simply could not afford to bail them out, the money literally did not exist.

Also, today’s Iceland is extremely troubled by austerity. Schools and healthcare is extremely underfunded. Teachers- and nurses strike almost every 2 years. The city of Reykjavík just started their biggest round of mass-layoff ever.

MonkeyClub • yesterday at 3:29 PM

Wild guess: I suppose in Iceland the banks weren’t buying the politicians.

➕ show 2 replies
quickthrowman • yesterday at 4:59 PM

Iceland isn’t a global financial powerhouse and it has a low population. My county has twice as many people as Iceland, the city I live in has as many residents as Iceland has citizens.