logoalt Hacker News

Polymarket 1h halt after vendor compromise; affected users will be 'made whole'

95 points • by theanonymousone • today at 3:23 PM • 37 comments • view on HN

Comments

sroerick • today at 7:58 PM

About a month and a half I made a Polymarket account with my Google login. I never traded anything. My account got hacked and they started draining my bank account. Polymarket support was completely non responsive. My bank reversed the charges. About 5 days later I got a text from Polymarket support telling me that it looked like I was having trouble making a deposit and they could help me out. I sent them screenshots of them not responding to my support requests and then never heard back.

My Google account was not compromised. I wouldn't touch Polymarket ever again. There is some kind of massive scam happening here.

dumberquestions • today at 5:11 PM

Friend of mine, who's been treated as the unlucky one as an inside joke, made a binance account - after avoiding crypto for years - just hours before the hack happened, it's now official lore that this whole chain of security incidents is entirely his fault.

trio8453 • today at 4:15 PM

Kind of insane how much of the front page is about security compromises today.

➕ show 6 replies
rhodey • today at 6:45 PM

This is the same style of attack that took 1.5B from Bybit ~1yr ago.

Fundamentally: There is no way to lock webapps to reproducible builds.

Except: IPFS could do it but IPFS has been very very poorly maintained.

I published IPFS-boot ~1yr ago and its a simple idea:

1. deploy a webapp bootloader using something immutable like IPFS

2. bootloader is basically react hot reloading except user agrees what to load

3. bootloader polls a mutable list of app updates and user agree or disagree each update

Now the bootloader has a static content addressable URI but it can also do updates. TBH I think IPFS may be a lost cause but something needs to take its place and this idea is transferable to whatever that is. https://github.com/rhodey/IPFS-boot

➕ show 2 replies
gnabgib • today at 3:26 PM

Discussion yesterday (46 points, 13 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50295883

Wired's coverage (25 points) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50296328

WSJ's coverage (20 points) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50294287

VCFundedGenYer • today at 9:06 PM

This scam website had it coming.

mvc • today at 4:25 PM

How much tax revenue does the UK government get from polymarket. Why should UK tax payers pay to investigate a breach of their systems?

➕ show 1 reply
bcvvvy • today at 7:29 PM

Oh so these incidents are why we have regulated markets! Who’d have thought?

totallymike • today at 5:48 PM

[dead]