logoalt Hacker News

iamnothere • yesterday at 3:39 PM • 2 replies • view on HN

Why is the “bust” part of the economic cycle something to be avoided at all costs? Isn’t this a natural part of the cycle, like smaller fires that clear out undergrowth in the forest? Isn’t it possible that preventing this by any and all means will lead to much worse outcomes in the long run?

Moral hazard as a concept (as something to be avoided) basically doesn’t exist anymore. Or rather, the whole market now embodies moral hazard. This seems bad.


Replies

makmanalp • yesterday at 5:35 PM

Because if you let the market fail then people suffer. If people suffer they vote the incumbent out.

Could somewhat help break the cycle by having a safety net for people instead of for overleveraged companies and banks but the US is allergic to that concept.

➕ show 1 reply
neutronicus • yesterday at 4:52 PM

Because a bunch of people become homeless, commit suicide, and otherwise suffer.

Feel free to run for office on a "periodic culling" platform, though

➕ show 2 replies