logoalt Hacker News

myersj • yesterday at 4:37 PM • 1 reply • view on HN

> We could remove these weird constraints by making health care a government service rather than a highly contorted pseudo-market, but that would not be the American way. It has to at least look like a market, even if it’s an ineffective, inefficient, opaque, corrupt one.

It is still a market (and a single-payer one, ultimately) in these places, but it is not a government service. It is the best solution: the government funds the appropriate cost of care, the provider group is financially responsible for meeting it, and they are incentivized directly to get it right.

The left needs to stop shrieking about Medicare-for-all and the right needs to stop pretending like it can even spell healthcare. There are good solutions.

> but also encourages just refusing to treat people.

It categorically does not. It would be foolish to do so.


Replies

longerthoughts • yesterday at 4:56 PM

>It categorically does not. It would be foolish to do so.

Foolish hardly implies categorically false. It's a well-documented incentive for other risk-bearing entities (see insurance claim denials). Why are providers under capitated contracts categorically immune to refusing treatment to protect margins?

➕ show 1 reply