The author’s example chose to use the syntax that returns None on missing. If they wanted clarity the standard API does raise.

  cache = {“key”: “value”, “some input”: None}
  cache.get(“missing_key”)

  cache[“missing_key”]

it’s maybe less “pythonic” but at $dayjob we’ve very actively moved away from exceptions for things in favor of things that are statically type checked. too many things that become runtime bugs instead of type checking bugs.

with match now being available, we even return explicit error objects and the ergonomics are pretty good (reminds me of rust).

Perhaps the author has had their fair share of run-ins with libraries that didn't think their API through like that. But yes, they should.