logoalt Hacker News

bartread • yesterday at 11:40 PM • 10 replies • view on HN

I dunno: this is pure anecdata but software engineers I know well - including me - all say they’re delivering multiple times faster, so it’s definitely good for something.

I don’t know about other tasks, but it’s pretty rad for coding, testing, DevOps, and config.


Replies

FabHK • today at 2:17 AM

A friend of mine works in fashion. Very briefly for background: there are runway models (who walk on live shows), and catalogue models (who work in studios presenting clothes against a neutral background in standard poses, more or less as living mannequins). The latter are being increasingly replaced by AI.

jeremyjh • today at 12:18 AM

This research is specifically NOT about tech companies. It is about the rest of the fortune 500.

If you are in software or IT at a non-tech company that is in the fortune 500, the impact of significantly better productivity may not be measurable in aggregate in the company's P&L.

In smaller companies I expect it could be more measurable because some of them really are using AI much more effectively across many functions. But we're finding it very hard to measure meaningful outcomes.

➕ show 1 reply
LastTrain • today at 1:23 AM

If only I wasn’t using all that productivity on fixing vulnerabilities

fzeroracer • today at 2:05 AM

One weird trick that devs learn to deliver faster: simply just drop all guard rails and push directly to prod. We need to make sure our velocity report looks good after all.

mguerville • yesterday at 11:51 PM

Same story here in my first hand experience + colleagues experience in corporate strategy, FP&A, Marketing and corporate development.

moron4hire • today at 12:04 AM

People are not reliable narrators on their own productivity. They often mistake activity for productivity.

➕ show 1 reply
kxrm • yesterday at 11:45 PM

AI EM here, same. The level of productivity has increased dramatically in the last 2 months. Reliable code also has increased due to AI.

This train isn't stopping.

What trips up a lot of SEs where I work is their techniques. Everyone who follows our process delivers faster and with higher reliability so far.

0c3ca83 • yesterday at 11:45 PM

But is it churn or value? Most of the software I use has gotten visibility worse as you deliver multiple times faster.

I would pay extra for a company that just slowed down and moved deliberately.

ForHackernews • yesterday at 11:44 PM

I'm not sure I'm any faster, but I think the end result is better and I've attempted some big refactors and new architectures that I would never have tried without AI.

N=1 but I'm not sure it's made my bosses any richer. What we're shipping has better tests and documentation than it ever would have before AI.

techpression • today at 12:22 AM

Most, not all, are just delivering more bad stuff faster. I personally also think I deliver more good stuff with AI, but the products I use are just getting worse daily it feels like. Just the other day I noticed Slack had installed some disgusting menu bar icon for their AI bot, without asking, just to take a fresh example of this.