logoalt Hacker News

anonymous908213 • today at 12:11 AM • 3 replies • view on HN

For being one of the biggest AI boosters on HN, you'd really think you could make a stronger case than "Apollo is bad because they observed and reported on a fact". It wasn't a prediction, so there's nothing to "hold up very well".


Replies

qlte • today at 12:46 AM

Misunderstanding what actually qualifies as a "prediction" seems to be a recurring problem among AI commentators.

I've seen dozens of posts/top comments in the last few years dunking on "AI skeptics" for statements that didn't even vaguely resemble an actual prediction.

Like the front page post from Karpathy which got 600+ upvotes by throwing an AI model at old Hacker News comments without any human vetting to score "predictions". And upon further inspection included a bunch of unambiguously factual statements of the present or conditional if-then logic about the future which when glossed over for convenience become "failed" predictions.

simonw • today at 12:20 AM

I'm judging them here based on their chosen headlines.

➕ show 1 reply
gnabgib • today at 12:23 AM

A surfer is not a wave booster, this is a poor characterization.