> btw, shipping more code isn't necessary a good thing.

This is FUD. It isn't necessarily a good or bad thing.

At the very least, using AI to audit your code is responsible use. The testing is the same as it ever was. If there was a chronic problem with shipped AI assisted code, it would be a popular talking point.

> If quality isn't controlled properly, it eventually shows up as negative in the top line.

This an idealistic pillar of capitalism that has been falsified across time. Depending on what someone means by "controlled properly", I don't think this wasn't been true before AI and I don't think it's demonstrated post-AI. Momentum (notably capture) keeps the software markets resistant to quality defects.