logoalt Hacker News

warkdarrior • today at 3:19 AM • 4 replies • view on HN

> Technical details aside, this volume is ridiculous. How on earth do they see this kind of "growth" as an asset and not a liability?

That coding volume is a liability only for human engineers, with their limited memory, short attention span, tiredness, and quirky coding preferences. LLMs don't have any of those problems.


Replies

zdragnar • today at 4:25 AM

Every bit of code is more context getting soaked up in future agent runs. More context used = worse output. More tests need to be written, then fixed, using up more compute, time and context without adding value compared to a more thoughtful, efficient implementation.

➕ show 1 reply
mrbungie • today at 3:34 AM

Not necessarily. High LoC software is a potential bad design smell (without a counterfactual for the same level of functionality it might not be easy to tell though). Badly designed code entering an agent context is always a liability, because it contaminates decisions down the road, and makes new work slower as it needs more tokens to process and navigate old code.

throwaway27448 • today at 3:24 AM

Sure, but you also don't know what your LLM is doing without running into these same limitations. So how is this an improvement?

➕ show 1 reply