Ask HN: What's your current AI agentic setup?

1) none

2) no openrouter (yet) but that will happen (I’m catching up on so many things). Local LLMs on an M1 Max (Unsloth, LM Studio, occasionally directly llama.cpp). Muse Glimmer largely (because it is really very nice for what it is optimised for: interactive coding sessions). Qwen 3.8 27B occasionally and a couple of other things for fun (the LFM MoE model, experimenting with Nemotron Bolt 74B-9B, playing with Gemma 4 12B QAT when working on photography research; I still think this is the low key best LLM of 2026, when you consider capability vs overhead)

3) I tried OpenCode; I couldn’t quite get on with it and what ultimately made me switch was trying to understand its terribly messy source code). Currently focusing my attentions on Pi via Paseo and Pendant. Pi is just much better in smaller context sizes, and it is the right fit if you are keen to learn from first principles.

4, 5) I am mostly using AI as a coding sidekick so I don’t really have much need for orchestration yet. I did some experiments with Osaurus (really quite impressive) and I actually think that is almost enough by itself, except that I want a little more control over the sandbox container.

- Antigravity (AGY - Google Ultra $100/month), mostly gemeni flash but I benchmark Gemini Astra sometimes. My main driver because it’s pretty good at search compared to setting something up with DSH.

- DeepSeekHarness (DSH) Desktop using:

—- with pay as you go DeepSeek tokens, more expensive to use during my night/Chinese daytime, otherwise very cheap

—- oMLX on my MacBook driving mostly a Qwen 3.6 35b A3b MOE (mostly used for benchmarking a less capable model)

I mostly do custom subagent programming and can trigger subagents in AGY and DSH easily enough. DSH supports a Python coordinator orchestrating DSH subagents as conversations via RPC. AGY only supports a sub-agent orchestrating other sub-agents but it works well enough at this point. I plan on releasing my subagent framework soon (called autofab in pypi), which is basically a specification driven code development agent system (using existing agent harnesses rather than implementing my own).

I tried goose, OpenClaw, Claude, codex, etc…and they didn’t really work for what I needed. I might get a $100/month ChatGPT subscription to go with my Google one, primarily to get a different perspective and benchmark openAI models on codex (Claude doesn’t really support what I need it to, otherwise would go for that instead).

DeepSeek Harness using DeepSeek Flash API

Nothing else, DS is smart enough to do everything I ask for and more, never hallucinates and never disappoints. Apps in Rust, Swift, Node, we even designed a new language better suited for LLMs, a compiler, and it runs beautifully. Haven't coded a single line since May 2026 and I will remember that date as the day AI took over my mundane job as programmer and promoted me to architect or director of my own apps

A custom plugin to ring a bell whenever a task is finished and a gong when a question needs an answer, that way I can play backgammon or mahjong in the meantime

I can't be happier

https://github.com/seanturner026/f

There’s an excalidraw in the reader

My manager described this as incomprehensible lol but it’s modeled on conductor but uses Claude code terminal and mods and glues a bunch of open source stuff with a cli I had Claude write. Herdr for sessions, nvim for code review / searching, cli invoked by /slash commands. Beads cli for task tracking. With multi repo support since I end up doing a lot at work across repos at work for a “feature” which is how I delineate chats now. And I’ve got a nice picker for swapping sessions so screen real estate isn’t wasted. Many incremental improvements the sum of which are compelling ime

I use Claude and codex and use my own orchestrator to run them. I also used to have open code for a while but the recent codex and Claude models are token efficient so don’t need additional models.

Models: I pay Z.ai a lite sub which costs me ~9USD/month and for the last months I've been using `glm-5.3-flash` amost exclusively for my day-to-day. I also make use of free models from OpenRouter for simple CI/CD automated stuff but very little so. When I'm out of sub tokens I fall back to DeepSeek credit. I keep my sub/credit usage public at https://a.l3x.in/usage

Harness: when building/troubleshooting I use https://pi.dev TUI most of the time, the rest of the time is via an issue/PR driven workflow also powered by Pi with this action I built on top of its SDK: https://github.com/shaftoe/awesome-pi-coding-agent/

My general take on AI at https://a.l3x.in/ai

Generally speaking, I think I can hardly be happier than what I am already, the quality of open weight models is incredibly good and the only upgrade I could think of is being able to run one on my workstation one day (I don't even try on my Macbook Air M1), which isn't something crazy to dream about, perhaps in 2/3 years running Deepseek v4 Flash or similar model locally won't require too much of an investment in hardware.

1) I pay for claude ultra coz the plan rates are significantly better than the api rates, and i feel like i can tokenmax harder than if i am constantly watching my credit balances.

2) yea openrouter free models, usually nemotron coz they have decent availability and I don't get constantly rate limited like with the gemma models on there.

3) honestly still using the default IDE, used to use claude code cli but nowadays i just launch claude remote control and just talk to it through my phone.

4) something custom, i wired it all up in slack so i could easily talk to agents through the same place i do my work

5) Used to use openclaw on a raspberry pi to experiment with like autonomous development but i needed something with a bit more transparency so i moved everything into slack.

I’ve moved from paid subscriptions on Codex to Claude to Muse.

I now use Muse as my primary agent and then spin up and manage Codex and Claude agents as needed on an Oracle server.

$DAY_JOB gives me GitHub Copilot with generous limits so I use GitHub Copilot CLI. We're a Microsoft shop so that dictates some choices too.

My workflow is a windows terminal app with multiple sessions running under wsl2 in each pane since LLMs seem to do better with bash than PowerShell. I don't trust these things much so I've got a careful list of read only tool calls and filesystem sandboxing set up so it can do some useful stuff like read my task board and publish draft PRs without a ton of overbearing permissions prompts.

I usually chat with that for a bit on a task until it's plan sounds good then I have it spin up a Docker Sandbox microvm under Windows so it can safely run yolo mode and make all it's changes. When it's ready I carefully review and iterate on the result until it's ready to publish the PR.

Bit kludgy but strikes a balance of safety and multitasking I'm comfortable with. IME most folks don't think much about isolation so curious to hear if anyone else has a similarly isolated but better workflow. I'd like to try OpenShell instead of docker sbx but it lacks microvm support for windows and I don't want another layer of nested virtualization since my windows machine itself is a cloud VM.

Work also gives me access to GHCP for personal use so I use it for side projects too. Idk what I'd use if I had to pay out of pocket, probably something a cheap Claude plan. For noncoding personal use I mostly just use free tier Gemini. If this stuff ever slows down I'll invest in some GPU nodes for my homelab and run local models.

It used to be more interesting and elaborate, switching between different models. I used to use Cursor, then Codex, but since Opus 5.5 came out, I just use the Claude IDE. I got rid of all my skills and just set it to medium. Then I vaguely talk to it about very high-end things that I want, and it comes back with magic. Rinse and repeat.

I'd say the biggest trick is just to tell it what complete looks like. Be very specific about what you want it to come back with once it's done. That gives it a good idea what the goal is. It'll automatically create subagents and all that stuff. Although if you have money to burn and you're doing something large, you can tell it to just go wide or boil the ocean.

Also, make sure you're working on at least five different things. Otherwise, you're sitting around for one agent.

1) I use 2x ChatGPT Pro 200, and a Claude Max 200.

2) I use other models via Open Router, but ChatGPT beats them in value (at the moment) thanks to Tibo's resets.

3) I mostly make Claude coordinate a group of Codex agents. They've set up a communication channel between them, and Claude acts as the coordinator and a second verifier. This saves me time because it's easier to talk to one agent than a group of agents. Codex parent session does only "comms" with Claude, and all the other agents run as sub agents.

4) For non coding usecases, I use https://www.ctlflow.com. This lets me run dozens of agents on tasks like equity analysis. The information a swarm of agents can surface from a large data store can be quite surprising.

5) I have tested OpenClaw, but now I just use ctlflow.com or claude + codex.

$200/ea plans on Claude and Codex, plus OpenCode Zen for experimenting with other models, plus Qwen3.8-28b locally. (I test-drove DS4 Flash locally in a 128GiB MBP for a while, but the tokens per second were too slow to be useful for more than being a toy.) At my prior anchor client I had an additional max20 plan; at my current anchor client they have a teams plan.

I use both Openrouter and OpenCode to get Kimi, GLM, big Qwen, etc, but not at great scale. I have a security product that consumes API tokens that I built against Opus 4 when that was the strongest available; when I get around to it I’ll likely shift it to prefer GLM or Kimi, slightly for cost but mostly for non-refusal.

I spend a lot of time in Claude Code because it’s the only Anthropic subscription-friendly harness. Additionally use OpenCode and codex. Not much time spent in pi these days. I used Aider before Claude Code’s beta. Claude Code’s plugin framework is pretty decent, so I tend to stand up a repo of custom plugins against every client repo I work with. It’s a nice efficiency layer for me up front and often grows into a bonus client deliverable after a couple months of refinement.

OpenClaw runs persistently, mostly for little calendar tasks and trying to mitigate my ADHD: energy level check-ins, redirects to use attention for things that matter. It orchestrates Hermes under the hood but I don’t interact with the latter directly.

I still mostly just use tmux directly and tell running sessions about each other, sending messages to each other via text files or send-keys/capture-pane. Herdr is installed but mostly unused. The GUI clients aren’t my thing; I’m a born console junkie.

What I really want to change next is pulling this all back into emacs.

1) Claude Pro $20/mo (I'm retired now and just playing on personal projects)

2) I have API usage via Together for a number of toys I have built for my kid, I probably could refactor this but it predates getting a Claude Pro subscription.

3) Claude Code letting it do the work, pure vibes and dropping to vstudio as needed.

4) No

5) Muse, I have it doing things like basic research, waiting on ticket windows and just being a personal assistant. It also does a really good job at scraping churning forums and blogs and has made a few thousand dollars in the last month just on bank and brokerage bonuses. It does all the record keeping and I just sanity check the dates, hold periods and do the account opening / transfer work. I'm eager to see Anthropic's take on this space and hope it uses the same Chrome integration. Muse's biggest flaw is that it runs it's browser actions from a datacenter instead of a local host and a real browser.

1 - Opencode Go $40, Claude $20, $0-100 on Deepseek API

2 - No

3 - I use a lot of Opencode + Deepseek, strategize some of that work with Claude Opus, and some gtm, research, and project stuff in Hermes with its coding agent. When I guide by hand I use Orca Dev, which is lovely.

4 - Claude drops GitHub issues that Opencode picks up on a schedule. It’s simple and resilient enough for me. Hermes has a lot of scheduled tasks to move things forward.. it has gtm and research and dev loops (the latter builds autonomously for future projects vis a vis my attention, I’ve used quite a bit of it).

5 - Hermes Agent, which has become a core tech for me. I’ve tried to use Openclaw but it has not been something I can keep running. It spirals and crashes after a week in ways I’ve never experienced from Hermes, doing the same things. I have little interest in those generalist agents, maybe after a year.

Claude 100$/mo for personal projects.

Opus 5.5 for 99.9% of tasks. Fable for the rest.

Harness: Claude Code plugin for VS Code. At some point I guess I'll switch to just the claude code app but tbh this is super ergonomic for me.

No agent orchestration besides literally just letting claude spin up agents for me.

No broader systems.

And I'm _massively_ productive with the setup I describe above. I say this not to gloat, I'm sure others have great methods but I do say this in case anyone is feeling overwhelmed by the options out there. My 2 cents is don't overthink it.

1) Home - Claude $20, Gemini web, ChatGPT web. Work - Claude $200.

2) No.

3) Claude Desktop (home/work). Cut and paste when using Gemini or ChatGPT

4) No

5) No.

Claude Code Desktop on Windows: I like it. Simple UI that I started using about 2-3 months ago and have grown with it. Multiple sessions, virtual groups for sessions, etc. I can see my manual workload of managing things is getting larger so I want better project tooling. Some of the default selections tend to stick with what you selected first and I dont like those aspects (new sessions seems to default to your original/first session folder - so we need to clean that up or create some built-in /new-session skills, etc)

However, what I really want now is voice integration without having to click on the speaker icon and talk to it (or a way to keep the speaker icon depressed) . I want the ability to get off my chair and away from my screen and talk to it. This part is easy, I think, and would be a good start. To close the loop I would like to hear the feedback. However... getting the responses to have a 'conversation modality' instead of a 'verbose text modality/Claude speak output' may be a bigger challenge. The workflow will never be 100% display free. But if we can get the audio aspects worked out, projection could be to a pair of smart glasses (XReal, Apple, Meta, Google) - activated only when needed (read something or see a UI design, etc) and then pushed aside.

Anyone one have a minimal keyboard/display approach working for them?

At work:

Opus 5.5, fast mode, xhigh/max reasoning, ultracode as needed. Usually 5-8 agents going at any given moment. In-house frameworks for Claw-like workflows and agent orchestration.

At home:

Cry

I like using Cline the VS Code extension. It can use local models and local inference with Ollama and tons of external inference providers like AWS Bedrock, Vertex, etc. It asks for permission to read webpages or run commands. You can give it whitelisted permission to just read your files which is what I do. If you want, you can put it into ACT mode and give it permission to write to files but I avoid that. If you use something like Bedrock, it shows you how much the conversation costs. It works great with Claude for coding but if I'm doing something super small I might use a local Qwen or Gemma model.

I subscribe to OpenCode Go when I have a personal projects I need to work on. It's by far the best value since it's only $10 and I doesn't run out of its five hour limit in an hour they way Claude Code/Codex do. Models are more than good enough.

At work, I'm using Codex with the subscription they give me, and I don't really have anything to complain about.

I don't bother picking obscure tools and heavily configuring them since almost all of the intelligence is in the model, and models themselves improve so fast that any complicated setup will be obsolete in a few months. All of the useful behavior just gets trained into the models, and all useful functionality gets added into every harness very quickly.

I'm not using any personal agents since I don't see any use case.

For local inference, DS4.1F 1017 quantized to 2.25 bpw from oh-my-pi; this is slow (~500 tps prefill, 30 tps decode) because it's a Radeon R9700 on PCIe4. When I don't need local inference, Opus 5.5 reviewed by GPT-6.1 Sol in VS Code, both $20/month. Mostly I use them to build small analysis tools because I am not really an individual contributor any more. I used to hit both my session and week quotas frequently, but that is much less common since Opus 5.5.

1) 3x Claude Ultra subscriptions and $20 tiers of Codex/Cursor/Gemini, the latter three mostly for multi-provider testing and Google's bundled cloud storage. I basically only use Opus xhigh, but never touch Ultracode.

2) No. The subscriptions are too much value compared to API. If i were to start using any model on API, the first one I'd consider would probably be Inception Mercury 3, for the 1000t/s speed.

3) I use my own custom kanban agent management tool named Kotkit, which I have been developing since March. It has a built-in multi window desktop which I can use from my phone as a PWA.

4) I am currently building orchestration/swarm capabilities into my tool. Currently adding multi-agent deep research and code review workflows orchestrated by my tool, so that they are cross-provider and my agents can trigger these on demand, as well as experimenting having one agent complete an epic ticket on the kanban board by orchestrating task agents (this is all wired up so AskUserQuestion and ExitPlanMode, etc. on the task agents are answered by the main agent, and if the main agent is unsure, it delegates to me). Currently doing it on a >20-task code migration epic with a lot of success.

5) No. AI is not yet good enough at long-term planning for these to be useful for real work. You have to build step-by-step up to it. These agent platforms are good for simple personal tasks, but to use them for actual work would be skipping a lot of steps.

Copilot in VS2026 + GPT5.5 configured as a custom model (API Tokens). Same as it was 6 months ago.

I really want to use 6.1 Terra, but the way copilot is set up in visual studio proper, they don't handle reasoning models correctly (or maybe my install is screwed up). Eventually, I will dust off that old winforms project and get my custom harness working with the latest responses API contract.

I prefer (pre) paying for tokens. You can offer me all the proof you want but I'll still never believe that those subsidized tokens are always the same as the ones I get through the API.

1, work - claude team pro (not paying for), home, codex pro (for side hustle https://rolloutrhino.com/)

2, no, except at work where I have a whole agentic helpdesk system that self improves, creates documentation, and is quite awesome really. Pretty cheap to run also.

3, my own that I keep iterating on, but I do use the clis, though with codex, the app is just awesome, don't use the tui (its good, but the app is better). Claudes app sucks in comparison, though is often better than the TUI.

4, my own tools, mostly because I started on my own ones ages ago.

5, dots, It's kind of like a project manager for the side hustle, its really coordinating a lot of stuff between all the things I have in flight

1) Claude Ultra (aka Max 20x)

2) No

3) Claude Code

4) Custom WIP https://muster.town/

5) Custom personal agent setup https://github.com/mitchellgordon95/miniclaw

Usage is mainly wiki building around personal info (finances, topics of interest), calorie counting, and doing various things from my dumb phone (rideshare booking, checking MTA Bus schedules, etc.)

1. I've been using the $100 github copilot tier but am looking for something cheaper, as my usage is waning somewhat. I like to hop between models for comparison, but openrouter always seems to end up being way more expensive for the flagship models. I also keep a GPT Plus subscription for voice, until someone has a comparable offering

2. No outside models yet. Working on a setup for that. Sometimes I throw some money at openrouter to check out the mega-cheap options.

3. At home I really like goose (TUI), but have been messing with opencode (TUI mode)lately which is also nice. At work I use Zed with a corporate claude subscription and it's a good setup.

4) Not really. I tried some of the opencode swarm plugins awhile back but they didn't seem to work right. In general I don't really have the energy for messsing with a new plugin ecosystem. I also like to work in a _tight_ loop, conversationally as things are being built, steering all the decisions. I have next to no desire to hand a larger task to a "team of AIs" to replace my input with more AI.

5) No

I drive a lot and spend a lot of time talking to GPT voice workshopping ideas, talking at a conceptual level, looking up things I'm curious about, and discussing design and problems I'm having, sometimes even work problems. I use goose for all kinds of stuff, mostly infrastructure and debugging for now but I've written a couple programs with it as well.

1) Claude Pro (the $20/mo tier). No other subscriptions.

2) I use models on open router occasionally, primarily GLM and Deepseek models. I’ve experimented with Qwen locally but the models that run on my hardware are too dumb for extended use cases and too slow for quick questions.

3) Personal use: Primarily Zed. I use employer paid Claude Code in the day job but it eats tokens at a rate I’m not willing to pay for for personal use. I’ve tried OpenCode but their security track record is uninspiring and I’m way more defensive about my personal hardware than my employer is about their hardware fleet.

4) No

5) No

I use a custom Daemon. I tried OpenClaw and Letta and it was like emailing your AI. I have a 64gb Mac m1 Max and the largest model I could run in openclaw was a 27b because its not built for local AI, it's built for API. I wanted something that you could chat to, collaborate with, build, evalutate the code, make corrections, build, repeat. I couldn't find anything that didn't come with massive latency so I just made my own. Now I'm running a 125B A3B model at 30 tok/s using SSD Streaming and my agent is instant with no latency and can do everything I ask. I use Aider for programming, exa for searching.. I'm happy with it.

1) Neither. 2) Yes, I use pay as you go from OpenAI and Anthropic. 3) OpenCode 4) No 5) No

I use OpenCode to update my Home Assistant automations. Home Assistant also does two lightweight checks a day using gpt-5-luna (Look at this photo is the pool cover on or off?). I also use OpenCode for a few other small basic tasks.

This is me personally. At work I have a ChatGPT sub an a, seemingly limitless (I don't use it much tho) OpenAI API key.

1) Only ChatGPT Plus at the moment cause I'm between jobs and couldn't justify all the subs. Grok gave me three months at $30 when I tried to cancel so there's that too.

I wanted to really keep Claude but ChatGPT voice mode is too good tbh and no other comes close. I wish I could use Opus 5.5 for coding.

2) OpenRouter PAYG, mostly for experimenting with Chinese models like Deepseek and GLM, usually for stuff that Codex or Grok refuses to do.

Had been looking into NEAR and Venice for completely private information processing (like emails) but haven't set them up yet.

3) Codex, and OpenCode as harnesses basically.

4) I really wish I could decide on some agent orchestrator without trying them out for weeks. I like my tools highly powerful and trying to find recommendation for this online is hopeless because it's full of opinion from people who never used a terminal before.

5) Grok Bot for running experiments with supplements, calory tracking etc.. Tried to set up Hermes a couple of times but hated it every time. Just gave Rakazo a try yesterday and still hating it.

Gosh, I dream about the time when you could look at a github repo and make a decent guess about the quality of the software.

For building, I started with Kiro and later switched to Antigravity (Opus 5.5 for planning, Gemini 3.8 for implementation - but now using Argon for everything and quite happy). Claude for design.

Had a Hermes set up with a dual NVIDIA DGX Spark and Deepseek v4 Flash, but then built my own harness (getcinnamon.ai) and pretty much switched to that 100% including family members.

I use Muse Code $5 month

It has a 5 hour usage limit, and if using the wonder model, you basically only get 1 or 2 prompts. However, I find it will basically do unlimited 'turns', so as long as I give a good prompt, I can get my work done.

No ide/harness. I only do light coding and don't have time to actually sit at my computer.

1. Z.ai coding pro plan that i got last christmas for $14 a month. Will not renew in jan.

2. Locally hosted qwen 3.8 flash next on a wake on lan machine rtx5090

3. Currently orca as front end orchestrator to a mini pc with pi for coding and hermes for general purpose

1) Work covers my Claude and Codex subscriptions. Each is the ~$200/month tier.

2) I have a "live Zoom call audio transcription" setup that uses Silero VAD, Qwen3-ASR-1.7B, Qwen3-4B-Instruct, and pyannote speaker-diarization-community-1.

3) Claude Code in the Desktop UI using remote control environments.

4) Custom orchestrator for having Codex review Claude or vice-versa: https://github.com/navels/neal

5) I have built over time a personal assistant using Claude remote control running on a mac mini, this is likely similar to Dots?

Claude Pro for personal. (Kiro at work.)

Moving towards long-running, asynchronous delegation where I use a locally running instance of Fizzy kanban board to manage and track all work.

When I think of something I might want an agent to do, I create a card. When I want to delegate I assign to agent and move to To Do. I usually try batch things, then use a slash command to invoke a fizzy skill. I do this in a terminal and then close it and do other things.

Couple hours later I'll check the board and see what's in review column for me. Read comments, look over PRs, etc. Agent has broad access to specific project folders and repos.

In general feeling more like working with a colleague than chatting with a bot.

1) None.

2) Yes, trying different models and harnesses through many providers (free/trial). mimo-v2.6-flash, minimax-m3.1-flash, glm-5.3-flash, deepseek-v4.1-flash, gpt-oss:120b, nemotron-3.5.-super-vl.120b-a12b, and others.

3) Mostly eca.dev on Emacs, and Claude Code at work. Now trying the OpenCode one too.

4) No.

5) No.

1）claude（pro）、ChatGPT（business）、Kimi（pro）；各一个订阅； 2）是的；Deepseek（API）； 3）默认的CLI； 4）否； 5）否。

我是谁：一名做基础医学数据分析的博士研究生。

How about, what sandboxing are you using to prevent the LLM from doing something you don’t want? I’m using nono.sh and have restricted network and file access. I use nono’s proxy so the LLM never gets access to api keys. I create a separate api key for each service specifically for LLM usage, and I restrict those keys as much as possible

1. Claude pro monthly

2. Kimi on OpenRouter, Abliterated.ai as needed

3. Claude Code (with all models), Claude Desktop, tried pi.dev, opencode

4. No

5. No

Main use case(s):

- Software applications

- One-off automations (calendar sync from scraped data, email alerts)

- Deep research and planning for personal stuff

1. I use both Melious[1] and Entrim[2]. I have a Melious Pro subscription, €150/month and use Entrim pay-as-you-go API, because it's cheap.

I used to have two Mistral subscriptions, because I needed the extra capacity, but quickly realised I'd need three or more, so switched to the two providers above.

2. Providers covered in the first point. Regarding models I use a combination of GLM5.3, GLM5.3 Flash and Deepseek 4.1 Flash 1017. Which model I use depends on the task. GLM5.3 Flash for general chat and co-ordination tasks. Deepseek 1017 for most coding related work and GML5.3 for adversarial batteries and documentation.

3. Maki[3], although quite customised with various plugins. No python permitted, only Janet for scripting. Extremely limited bash calls, instead preferring to use the built in harness tooling, or plugin tooling I've written. AGENTS and skills used extensively. Mechanical gates also used to prevent certain actions, like remote git pushes without explicit prior approval.

I switched to Maki for the token saving strategies and stayed for the ergonomics, which I think I like, but maybe just feel comfortable with now.

4. None listed. The closest I come is a multipane Zellij setup with different agents running in different panes. Orchestration is still human in the loop though.

5. None

[1] https://melious.ai

[2] https://entrim.ai

[3] https://maki.sh/

I feel like this is a great opportunity to mention https://github.com/regnull/openbot, my attempt to create an open-source tool similar to Grok Bot. You can hook it up to OpenRouter and solve 80% of problems with 1/10th of the cost. I use it all the time. Contributors are always welcome.

VSCode + OpenRouter + flavor of the day cheap model.

I spend about $5 a month with this setup.

I was using VSCode with Claude Code extension, multiple tabs at once, multiple instances per worktree.... then I listened to the Lex Fridman episode with DHH [1] and they mentioned Herdr [2] and I tried it out - NEVER LOOKED BACK! It has been an extremely long time since I completely abandoned and changed my setup - surprised myself.

Herdr is awesome - it pings me when an agent is done or needs my attention and shows me all my terminal panes that are running an agent that I can access with one click.

I am now 90% Herdr terminal, open IDE maybe 1-2 times a day just for more convenient way to look at something. I searched ways to stay in the terminal - found lazygit and love it!

I use long-running worktrees (e.g. named worktree-1, worktree-2, worktree-3, ...) and have parallel work going on in them so I can work on whatever I want.

In each Herdr workspace, I have three tabs: 1st is for ~3 panes, one for Claude and two or more to run the app and basic terminal. Tab 2 for lazy git, and Tab 3 for an extra terminal when I need one. For example, right now I have ~20 Herdr workspaces open now between a few projects, multiple worktrees per project and a few across remote machines ready in case I need them. When in the zone, I might have 1-8+ agents working on completely different tasks.

I have a couple remote machines over SSH that I use when I need a task to run and I need to close my laptop.

I have a keyboard shortcut to init my workspace to that setup. lazygit is amazing.

I ask claude to do everything for me, for example: "Let's do it, open a jira ticket, assign to me and put into sprint. Fix it and open a pr"

I create artifacts all the time to share findings with team or as a checklist of manual testing I need to do.

I find that gh copilit does pretty good review on PRs, and I have a claude skill to go address all the copilot feedback (review, validate, reply, resolve, push changes if any were made).

I was on the 200/mo Claude plan but had to switch to the Team plan, so I pay 120/mo for two users and I swap to the 20 plan when I hit my 5hr limit on my 100/mo plan.

[1]: https://lexfridman.com/podcast -> DHH: Future of Programming, AI, Agentic Engineering, Vibe Coding & Linux [2]: https://herdr.dev/

1) the cheapest Claude sub, $20usd I think.

2) pretty much just opus

3) claude code - but with Orca + app (being able to dev remotely via the app has been great for personal projects)

Work has me stuck with Cursor, which I don't find as good, even when using claude models.

I'm currently using https://www.conductor.build/ for working on multiple projects at the same time with git worktrees and my Claude subscription. The annoying part is that if I have a frontend repository and a backend repository I have to tell each session "talk to this workspace to adapt the backend" if I'm working on the frontend. I wish they had better support for multiple repos in one session.

Separately I'm evaluating https://ampcode.com/ which is very polished, but I feel like the diff-reading part is not very prominent there which I find a bit odd. After watching many of their videos I feel like that's because they are opinionated on this not being necessary any more as the models are good enough. I kind of agree, but still like to give it a last glance before committing.

Phasing out my usage of cloud based LLMs/harnesses.

Focus is pi + self hosted GLM Flash.

Pi is lightweight and easily extensible and creates minimal extra noise. the output I get is very close to what I want to see.

my workflow is focused on clear turns between planning, testing and implementation. Any useful/recurring tasks, like getting/filtering logs, checking statuses etc get regularly folded into a project cli and agent skills that are local to the project.

I spend time interactively iterating on the plan/design and acceptance tests, then let it do its thing. Usually I have multiple interactive sessions at once that I'm steering this way. 1-2 assigned projects, 1-3 side projects (additional automation, experiments/POCs, workflow/process efficiency etc.). I generally don't do sub-agents. When I need throughput I automate first, frontloading the "deterministic" parts.

gptel + gptel-agent in emacs, hooked up to a Claude API token and ChatGPT oauth provided by work, plus some custom gptel additions (tools and tool invocation inspection mainly).

These comments read like people just bragging about having multiple AI subscriptions but not actually giving any info about what they're using them for

I only use genuine intelligence

I've been increasingly interested in language-oriented programming and denotational design. So i get claude to create a domain specific language in Racket modelling the software i'm trying to build, we create nouns and verbs whose meaning fits the behaviour i'm going for, then when we find bugs or notice we need more exceptional (less-elegant) one-off behaviour to tackle edge-cases, we iterate on the language in such a manner that it these are tackled emergently with preferably less concepts, more cohersion and composition. It's somewhat similar to how memory safety is handled at compile time in Rust but for business logic.