logoalt Hacker News

tyre • today at 3:14 PM • 5 replies • view on HN

This is exactly the argument people are worried about. "If prices go up, it's a good thing." For whom? Residents will have to pay this for a decade before a nuclear reactor comes online.


Replies

leoqa • today at 3:36 PM

“Let’s stop all new economic activity as it might have an effect on <insert commodity> prices” is just so juvenile and poorly thought through.

➕ show 8 replies
andsoitis • today at 3:33 PM

It will accelerate the shift to solar for residential purposes.

That’s a great thing.

rcpt • today at 3:35 PM

everyone gets a better grid.

➕ show 1 reply
tourmalinetaco • today at 3:40 PM

If we brought them up a decade earlier we wouldn’t have had to wait. Instead, we were told “renewables can replace fossil fuels”, despite us lacking the battery capacity to make them viable for the grid. Nuclear is a direct replacement for fossil fuels with better energy generation and actual on-demand capabilities, plus it’s far safer than fossil fuel-backed media will admit. We could have been using both and have completely cut down on emissions while also increasing the lifetime of our nuclear stores.

https://ourworldindata.org/safest-sources-of-energy

HumblyTossed • today at 4:02 PM

For that little old retired lady who is on a fixed income, of course! It means she'll have to sell that cute little house of hers and let someone turn it into an AirBnB and make some actual money from it.

/s