logoalt Hacker News

PorciiVorbesc • yesterday at 4:01 PM • 2 replies • view on HN

Put your money where your mouth is.

You go first sacrifice yourself, the finances of your family and your town, in order to save the global environment, to set an example, and we'll start to follow your lead when we'll see that your sacrifice has improved the global environment.

It's always convenient for you when someone else has to make sacrifices to their job security, housing, financial future, and comfort in order to save the environment, when you get to enjoy all the perks of their sacrifice, without needing to make any equivalent sacrifices yourself.


Replies

qlte • yesterday at 4:33 PM

Seems like this can go both ways. You should volunteer to have a bank of loud, polluting turbines from obsolete passenger jets running 24/7 next to your home so Meta can serve GenAI ads with 5% lower latency.

➕ show 1 reply
MSFT_Edging • yesterday at 6:02 PM

Sorry, your small town getting a short stint of construction work followed by maybe 20 sysadmins, is not worth the pollution that DC will pump.

I commute by rail to the tune of ~6000 miles a year. How long would it take for those gas turbines to make those greenhouse savings worth it?

Some napkin math, lets say a conservative 50MW/day? half what the XAI Colossus DC uses. So they'd be generating about 2MWh running 24/7.

Those gas turbines spit out ~700kg of CO2 per MWh.

My car would emit about 5 tonnes of CO2 over about 15k miles(2L hatchback).

The drive is far less direct than the train, so lets call it approximately 10k miles in commuting.

In a day, one of those gas turbines would produce about 16.8 metric tons of CO2. Over 3x what my car would produce. In a day. It takes me all year to save 4ish metric tons of CO2 from my personal carbon emissions.

Yeah, so screw your small town and screw the datacenter. We all share this world. Your small town isn't worth the damage.

➕ show 1 reply