alt Hacker Newsfuture economic activity is fine;
the questions are 1) who is footing the bill and 2) who is benefiting from that economic activity
if it's not the local community, then why should they agree to it much less pay for some of it
future economic activity is fine;
the questions are 1) who is footing the bill and 2) who is benefiting from that economic activity
if it's not the local community, then why should they agree to it much less pay for some of it
Further question, why is it the default position that others should have a say on legal activities you are allowed to do on your own land? Thats frankly absurd. It should be on the people breaching others private property rights to prove real damages.