logoalt Hacker News

mft_ • today at 3:15 PM • 3 replies • view on HN

That’s a little bit revisionist. I don’t like Musk much either but to be fair:

- no one in the established “expert” car companies thought that mainstream EVs were feasible. Sure, there may have been individuals, but it didn’t make it into corporate strategy or product delivery. The Model S plus the Supercharger network changed the face of the car industry.

- none of the clever brains spending billions in NASA, ULA, ArianeSpace, et al made a reusable commercial rocket a reality. They had an infinite head start vs. SpaceX and failed to innovate. Even now, having their lunch money regularly stolen by SpaceX, where is the reusable competition?


Replies

kibwen • today at 3:41 PM

> no one in the established “expert” car companies thought that mainstream EVs were feasible

No executive in the established "expert" car companies had any reason to rock the boat. Establishing EVs as a credible alternative to ICEs required a build-out of charging infrastructure that none of them were willing to commit to. But non-established companies had no such risk, and the emerging companies in China would have developed no less quickly even if Tesla never existed.

> none of the clever brains spending billions in NASA, ULA, ArianeSpace, et al made a reusable commercial rocket a reality

All of them would have told you that there's nothing impossible about a reusable rocket, only that their customers were happily served by their current offerings. Without Starlink, there would be no commercial demand that would make up for the cost of R&D.

➕ show 1 reply
wtfbro • today at 7:34 PM

[dead]

genxy • today at 3:41 PM

The clever brains at JPL worked on self landing rockets before they went to spacex. Your tax dollars at work.

https://www.alphaxiv.org/@lars-blackmore

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lars_Blackmore

https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=xZvK9z0AAAAJ&hl=en

➕ show 1 reply