logoalt Hacker News

FailMore • today at 4:48 PM • 1 reply • view on HN

This article talks about the outputs being Claude artifacts. I am curious if anyone has feedback on using Claude artifacts? What do you like/not like?

As a hobby I run https://smalldocs.org / https://github.com/espressoplease/smalldocs an agent agnositc artifact layer, so I'm looking for feedback on artifact use in general.

Here are some sample scientific SmallDoc artifacts:

Palmer penguins: body mass, flipper length and species - https://smalldocs.org/s/YrJDCfCD8-6j_uRE0pNCbI#k=odJRxWOIySV...

AlphaFold 3: capabilities, evidence and operational limits - https://smalldocs.org/s/rRRuByQhmhZNBH_4RNCx1t#k=S0Jhyf72Q6M...


Replies

theptip • today at 5:22 PM

Artifacts are amazing, I think they are not getting enough attention. They recently cloned most of the Google Docs / Notion features that I was using those connectors for. Comments are very useful for steering.

The missing feature for docs is now GDrive, ie organizing and cataloging your artifacts to build a coherent long-lived KB. But for that you can still export.

Anthropic added a while back the ability to let clients provide their own API key, again I think that’s under-explored and will become more relevant as AI gets more penetration.

Building out quick SPAs, HTML pages, etc is a great use, I think the innovation will be making these things supportable and usable for more than one-shot single-user artifacts. Eg user login, analytics, etc.