- Deciding not to prosecute crimes they agree with / which are commonly committed by their base. There are two ways to use the police against the people, you know.
- Speech controls (they wanted compelled speech, which is a line the Americans have so far managed not to cross - Biden managed to get it in to Title IX)
- Rabid, senseless, confusing opposition to gun rights, a civil right in the U.S. Gun ownership does not result in more or worse crime, it's very clear.
- Totally opposing widespread, bipartisan support for voter ID
Let me be clear, I'm no fan of either side.
> Deciding not to prosecute crimes they agree with / which are commonly committed by their base.
Like the Jan 6 pardons and Trump's immunity?
> Speech controls (they wanted compelled speech...)
https://democracyforward.org/news/press-releases/ooo-win-law...
"A federal court today ruled that the Trump-Vance administration unlawfully compelled civil servants at the U.S. Department of Education to transmit partisan political messaging from their government email accounts during the ongoing federal shutdown — violating core First Amendment protections."
> Rabid, senseless, confusing opposition to gun rights, a civil right in the U.S.
As is their First Amendment right. Do you oppose that civil right?
> Totally opposing widespread, bipartisan support for voter ID
Why not? When put to the people for a vote, it fails. https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/6178993-california-pro...