alt Hacker NewsNobody is solving it, because it cannot be solved in the LLM architecture? They are mitigating it.
We should stop using "solve" when we mean "releasing products to target". Nobody will ever solve this problem with LLMs as they are currently architected.
Replies
AtlasBarfed • yesterday at 8:50 PM
Liability you mean?
In my opinion all AI use companies should be attached to a specific employee, and that person is liable and so is the company of course for the actions of the AI
➕ show 4 replies
ares623 • yesterday at 9:26 PM
The preferred nomenclature is "largely solved"
(once you realize how much that phrase is used in the AI-sphere...)
case540 • yesterday at 9:43 PM
Thats like saying “no one can solve human error. Because it can’t be solve with humans”
I mean I guess? Sure?
➕ show 1 reply
Of course architecture can “solve” it.
It’s pretty simple. If you want security, you need to segment. Does that make it hard? Absolutely. Are you dumb if you’re letting rando traders access whatever with agents? Absolutely.