logoalt Hacker News

PixelOS

58 points • by emilburzo • today at 7:31 AM • 51 comments • view on HN

Comments

Fred27 • today at 9:55 AM

I struggled to work out what it was for and why I might want to install it on my Pixel 10 Fold - until it I went to the download page and dawned on me that it's to make non-Pixel phones look like Pixel ones.

It might be worth mentioning the whole reason for this to exist on the site somewhere.

➕ show 1 reply
petargyurov • today at 9:27 AM

Practically nothing useful on the About page. Can anyone chime in what this is exactly?

➕ show 1 reply
chrysoprace • today at 9:23 AM

So I guess the point of this is to provide a Pixel-like experience to non-Pixel phones? It's a cool idea but I think I'll personally stick with GrapheneOS for my next phone.

➕ show 1 reply
forgotpwd16 • today at 10:31 AM

Came across it recently, like a week ago, while looking whether my phone has any custom ROMs. Cool but worth noting it's quite in legal gray area. Pixel is trademarked by Google & bundling GApps requires* MADA license from Google & takes* actions to bypass Play Integrity.

*It's why more known custom ROMs (LaOS & crDroid) are distributed without GApps.

**Something certainly great for its users but creates risk for a backlash against custom OSes.

SilverSlash • today at 10:14 AM

Err...surely Google is going to sue? Can someone tell me how this is legal?

sergdigon • today at 10:18 AM

The idea is cool but as some pointed out the "About" page could be a bit more informative on what the rom contains (e.g. what is included, what is planned to be included, what are the limitations etc)

Also there are a lot of devices listed on the website but if you look a bit closer on the website you realize half of them are discontinued (38 active and 44 discontinued to be precise). I did some quick scrapping and this is the current status per brand:

Asus: 2/2 active (100%)

Nothing: 1/1 active (100%)

OnePlus: 8/10 active (80%)

Motorola: 4/5 active (80%)

Sony: 2/3 active (67%)

Realme: 5/10 active (50%)

Xiaomi: 16/33 active (48%)

Samsung: 0/12 active (0%)

Google: 0/4 active (0%)

10or: 0/1 active (0%)

Micromax: 0/1 active (0%)

Total: 38/82 active (46%)

Maybe it would make more sense to try to focus on one or two brands instead of trying to do all of them (at least at this stage)

➕ show 1 reply
coolness • today at 9:17 AM

There is no way Google will let this live right?

➕ show 7 replies
rustyhancock • today at 10:22 AM

I think this is a bad name for the project if they don't want heat from Google.

jon128 • today at 11:40 AM

An OS for the coomer consoomer.

nsoam • today at 10:51 AM

Do it for the 2 XL!!

xx_ns • today at 9:24 AM

It's always surprising how many people who like to tinker with their devices also deliberately want to tie themselves more into the Google ecosystem. I would've guessed that the Venn diagram of these two types of people wouldn't have much overlap, but the ROM's popularity kind of speaks for itself.

➕ show 5 replies