Most of the comments here are super salty. Agentic coding is here to stay, and the authors are here to make it better.
And as a test case they built a Linux-compatibe thing in Rust!
Al of this is cool to me, but what I read here in the comments: slop, stealing, evil people, no trust, etc.
Linux is open source: the license says that it can be used for any purpose, which includes training an LLM.
LLMs have made developers more powerful (like IDEs did, or CI/CD did, or better programming languages did, or Github did, or ...), but all I hear is nagging.
But you're basically rehashing things that have already been made by humans. What's the use in that?
We don't want or need hundreds of LLM generated Unix-clones which are merely slight variations on the Linux source code.
Don't quote the fucking license back at us. The license assumed benevolent humans, not industry apologist leeches like yourself.
> And as a test case they built a Linux-compatibe thing in Rust!
This naive 5-year-old style writing doesn't work any more. The Pelican guy is also no longer taken seriously.