logoalt Hacker News

mzagaja • today at 8:28 PM • 3 replies • view on HN

As someone who has done tons of geospatial work I hate this. A ZIP code was never technically a geospatial boundary. Being "inside" a boundary does not guarantee you have that ZIP code, just that the space is surrounded by a bunch of postal delivery addresses bearing the ZIP code.


Replies

konfusinomicon • today at 8:47 PM

most people dont know that zip codes are specific to the postal service and dont have anything to do with actual municipal government boundaries. the hierarchy of geo boundaries and the ways to locate and communicate within them is way more interesting than one would believe!

biker142541 • today at 8:33 PM

Polygons do have value in some workflows, if used with the appropriate caveats.

And in no instances have I ever run across use cases where these are worth paying any substantial money for. If USPS is going to jump into the fray here, really bad look (and probably net negative revenue for them) to offer as a paid product.

➕ show 1 reply
TimK65 • today at 8:49 PM

This. The USPS has always said that a ZIP Code was not a geographical area, but a collection of deliverable addresses. So what is this nonsense?