Nice job~~

So I've done a little bit of testing. When I loaded up the editor, I expected it to communicate with the installed binaries for my large language models, or possibly use a BYOK (bring your own key) approach. But once I understood that it's driven from the command line and you see the changes happen in the editor that gets spun up, I had no problems.

I've been experimenting a fair amount with LLMs driving procedural graphics myself, although my experiments have been mostly limited to relatively low-resolution stuff, such as EGA adventure game graphics.

So I decided to put Klad through a relatively hard test: I took a reference picture of an illustrated squirrel and asked it to recreate it, then set up the rigging for a basic walk cycle. This was using Fable 5.2 high.

Then I did the same thing, but with a more traditional approach, using standard generative models to manually create a walk cycle. This was all done relatively quickly, so bear that in mind.

Here are the results. I still think these are early days, and LLM-driven graphics are only going to improve.

And there are obvious advantages to a procedural system with rigging: Much easier to maintain consistency, palette control, and the ability to make precise alterations without having to deal with any kind of conventional in-painting nonsense.

https://imgpb.com/vJFpP