logoalt Hacker News

duplessitous • today at 2:01 PM • 69 replies • view on HN

I hope people understand that the affairs are not the reason he is being fired - NVIDIA has supposedly been skirting the export ban put in place by the previous administration. This was put in place for national security reasons. Whether you agree or disagree with the ban, it exists and Jensen&NVIDIA are in a world of trouble if this comes to light.

From all the reporting I've read, it is hard for me to avoid the conclusion that NVIDIA sold to China despite the export ban. I'd love to be wrong


Replies

kphorn • today at 2:08 PM

The image of Nvidia advocating for exports of GPUs to china while compromised by an allegedly Chinese agent is the real issue here. Endless congressional hearings on that topic starting in Jan. The Nvidia corp still has to answer for that even when Jensen is out.

➕ show 8 replies
netrap • today at 2:06 PM

Not the _only_ reason, sure. However, it's quite common when executives have an affair they will get fired. I think that's just the reality. If you publicly humiliate your family and the business, you're out...

➕ show 15 replies
irthomasthomas • today at 3:15 PM

Why? Because the government want to maintain the American advantage in GPU chips and AI? This move tips the scales in favour of China. Right now there is tens of billions of dollars of Nvidia GPUs sitting on the dock in Hong Kong because China government blocked them. They think it's more important to support their new domestic GPU industry than to have the best models today trained on nvida.

notenchange • today at 2:07 PM

Let’s be real here. Everyone making money out of NVIDIA was more than happy enough to go around the restrictions and see the prices go up due to Chinese demand.

Having these people saying otherwise is pure hypocrisy.

➕ show 2 replies
spiralpolitik • today at 2:49 PM

The first affair was possibly survivable, although the cost of survival would be high for all involved.

The second affair was fatal to Jensen Haung. An affair with a direct report is generally a no-no in modern business and would have opened Nvidia up for all kinds of liability issues if they knew in any capacity. If he stayed it would have made a mockery of their code of conduct rules and opened Nvidia up to further legal issues.

➕ show 1 reply
giancarlostoro • today at 2:38 PM

Why can't it be all of the above? I'm disturbed by the number of posts I'm seeing around social media downplaying the affairs as if this is normal behavior that should be encouraged or allowed. He slept with someone who worked directly under him, under what universe would he be allowed to stay at Nvidia? That's absurd.

➕ show 1 reply
karimf • today at 2:09 PM

I agree that this is a more likely explanation, given the AI arms race between the US and China.

I think NVIDIA lose more things by firing Jensen.

➕ show 1 reply
pwthornton • today at 2:26 PM

He committed what looks like some light treason. The fact that he had an affair with a Chinese intelligence asset who helped the CCP bypass import restrictions is why he had to go.

➕ show 1 reply
zuInnp • today at 3:20 PM

I mean having an affair with someone who works below in the company hierachy, is also a huge problem (if the thing about second affair is correct)

icyfox • today at 2:38 PM

I'll plug our Pretrained episode from Monday here - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N97DW8gfCnI - this chip export goes back years, through shell companies that are very easily traceable to Alibaba.

ChrisRR • today at 2:19 PM

There does seem to be a sway in the reporting towards his relationship with an employee and not the whole trade ban and spy stuff. I'm not sure why that is

➕ show 1 reply
brentm • today at 2:55 PM

We've had insatiable demand for Nvidia excluding China, I doubt they would have run that kind of legal risk.

fsnovask • today at 2:19 PM

It'll be a relative slap on the wrist. The US is not going to destroy one of the companies keeping it competitive on the AI landscape right now. Worst case, it is a heavy slap and some individuals go to jail, but the company will be fine.

But yeah, the affairs are probably just a last straw.

coldtea • today at 2:19 PM

>NVIDIA has supposedly been skirting the export ban put in place by the previous administration.

That's not the reason either.

They never did it in a way that was technically legal iirc. And the new administration allowed the exports later anyway and lifted the AI ban on July 2025.

Even she was a spy, the idea is that what? I can understand her snooping for fresh confidential info, in that, case, but what would her role be the sanctions? That just because he got her as gf, he made nvidia evade exports as a favor?

As if it was his personal bypass and not what the nvidia board wanted for the $$$?

They're likely worried about the optics of it, and what a Democrat administration, or increased power, would do to Nvidia stocks with such scandal as leverage.

sparklingmango • today at 3:05 PM

Do we know yet what the potential consequences may be? Legally or from a market/business standpoint?

root_axis • today at 2:55 PM

> I hope people understand that the affairs are not the reason he is being fired

People refuse to understand it. Every single thread is full of the same comments. People are obsessed with culture wars.

mlcrypto • today at 2:06 PM

What happens if all the money in the system circulating through AI companies turns out to be ill-gotten gains?

randyrand • today at 3:20 PM

Trump is on record saying Jensen should not be fired.

seydor • today at 2:26 PM

They were allowed to sell to china, just not their top models. It was widely known that china acquired those indirectly.

What changed is the publicity about the affair. So this is about the affair.

➕ show 2 replies
perrygeo • today at 3:07 PM

So many HN folks defending Huang's actions as "just an affair" - what an epic reading comprehension fail. Yes there is an affair, and that's what grabbed the initial headlines. But just read a paragraph or two and you'll find the espionage story.

For reference, the US has sentenced violators of export laws to decades of prison or even execution in extreme cases (when the Rosenburgs leaked nuclear secrets in 1953, they were sentenced to death). It's just shy of treason, legally. This is maybe one of the largest and most consequential intelligence breaches in history. Anyone who thinks this about an extramarital affair really isn't paying attention. Buckle up, its gonna get bumpy.

➕ show 1 reply
weryberl5 • today at 3:01 PM

I think they were selling to Malaysian shell companies to China.

phyalow • today at 2:34 PM

I think thats correct, I was at GTC in berlin a couple of weeks ago, a number of Chinese firms that are on the export control list were present and had booths… so perhaps this was all rather blatant.

throwaway2037 • today at 2:32 PM

    > Nvidia has supposedly been skirting the export ban put in place by the previous administration
I want to add some nuance to this statement. There is a difference between:

(1) actively assisting/violating the export ban. There is no evidence, nor any ongoing gov't investigation regarding this accusation.

(2) buyers redirecting legitimate, legal purchases to mainland Chinese companies. There is evidence and multiple ongoing gov't investigations by (a) Department of Justice, (b) Federal Bureau of Investigation, and (c) Department of Commerce.

I cannot find any senior Nvidia executives that have been charged with crimes for directly assisting/violating the export ban. That said, there may be ongoing gov't investigations, but I could not find any public press about them.

TheTrueAres • today at 2:22 PM

Being compromised kinda does seem like a reason to be fired. It seemed well known he was doing it since there are plenty of photos over a few years? So it’s more she was a honeypot.

christkv • today at 2:47 PM

They did not even need to sell them physically to China. Many of them ended up in Malaysian datacenters that rented them to China.

Gamer Nexus looked at it like a year ago https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1H3xQaf7BFI

zerr • today at 2:20 PM

Does it mean we will have mass produced cheaper graphics cards? Akin to flagship killer mobile phones and other hardware? Sounds good.

LastTrain • today at 2:18 PM

The affair is what led to this, demonstrating why it actually should matter if your CEO is having one. Ethics and trust should matter.

apercu • today at 2:59 PM

It will be interesting to see if there are criminal proceedings. If you or I violated ITAR or CMMC/NIST 800 there would be.

ActionHank • today at 2:09 PM

It may well be that it's his private life and it doesn't have much to do with things, but it is a contributing factor. The skirting of export bans was the reagent, but the infidelity is the catalyst that is making it much bigger.

CEO is supposed to be a high integrity position despite most tech CEOs trying to pretend that is not the case. If this person cannot be loyal to those closest to him, how can he be loyal to the company or shareholders?

sharpshadow • today at 2:09 PM

They didn’t sold the chips directly to China, they sold them to Megaspeed and they sold the compute to China.

➕ show 2 replies
shin_lao • today at 2:08 PM

The previous and current administration.

This is obviously something that has been postponed for after the midterms.

dreamcompiler • today at 3:06 PM

Jensen is Taiwanese. Nvidia's chips are made in Taiwan, as are all the most advanced chips in the world -- including the chips in Apple and AMD products -- by TSMC. China wants to re-absorb Taiwan into itself, partially because they cannot match TSMC's geometries and they desperately need those geometries.

Speculation here, but it's conceivable that China gave Jensen an ultimatum: Give us your chips and we'll delay invading your homeland for a little while longer. Of course this would have been implied since China never says anything so direct.

➕ show 1 reply
boringg • today at 2:40 PM

Um hard negative to what you are saying. It is absolutely fundamental to the issue -- its compounds the issues around assessing Jensen's judgement.

This story has more to it that will come to light .. I'm sure of it.

tsunamifury • today at 3:02 PM

The ban was lifted. I hate how insulate hm has become.

larodi • today at 3:19 PM

Well the only thing super weird is the timeline - USA bans exports, China (very soon after) bans IMPORTS! And then there's a company which keeps doing trade under the nose of the potentially two most powerful nation-states and their secret service sources. This is super fishy, really I don't buy nobody knew nothing, only for a "lucky" journalist to figure out the whole thing...

bluepeter • today at 2:10 PM

As though the Board had no idea of this, and are suddenly acting oh gosh this is the first we've heard of the phantom SG revenue! Time for Jensen to go. Nah, not buying it. Many of the board have been w JH since the early 1990s. This is because his reckless disregard for the company and his years-long relationship with a Chinese spy.

rzerowan • today at 2:35 PM

I dont think its more soo about the ban as China itself has 'officially' blocked the chips that were being licensed as exportable. I think its more of the asks that were being made by the NATSec and Amodie aligned actors (see the pod he had with Dwarkesh ), to ho tighter and more aggressive. Basically Jensen was sort of the brake on the impulsive ideas getting thrown around on how to 'win' AI and create a moat against all latecomers.

In any case pushing him out allows a freer hand for their shenanigans , so well know shortly what the asks were that he pushed back on (kill switches in chips?) if they get announced.

Also his role will be difficult to fill , seeing as hes had biz/gov relations going back decades with all relevant players in the semi industry from design ,litho,fabs to packaging etc.

ACCount39 • today at 2:09 PM

Him taking the stance of "we should be allowed to sell all the GPUs to China" was bad enough in itself.

Now that the possibility of him being compromised by an actual Chinese spy AND the possibility of Nvidia actually sanction-busting to ship to China regardless are on the table? Both at the same time, no less?

Yeah, that kind of liability is bonkers. Jensen might be too vital to load him into a cannon and fire him into the sun, but I'm not at all surprised that Nvidia wants him gone from the big post.

➕ show 1 reply
kaibee • today at 2:08 PM

> From all the reporting I've read, it is hard for me to avoid the conclusion that NVIDIA sold to China despite the export ban.

I thought this was like, basically an open secret? Like... I'm sure they stayed within the technical letter of the law? Except if any of the laws required them to not be grossly negligent and not be cartoonishly naive. So that they can later argue that they couldn't possibly have known that chips going to South East Asia were being resold to China?

gizajob • today at 3:12 PM

I think this episode proves one thing:

It would have been simpler and more profitable to sell China the GPUs.

One woman from the CCP just burned a couple of trillion out of your 401Ks. Have you said thank you even once? Are you sick of winning yet?

Topfi • today at 2:07 PM

Very much agreed, the second this became clear his position was untenable. He will surely have launched his unicorn by the end of December regardless, I’d be surprised if this had any tangible repercussions outside the divorce court.

Very much dislike that this in large part is overshadowed by his adultery, which should be considered separate and treated totally private, at least for the sake of his family.

snowwrestler • today at 2:30 PM

NVIDIA has supposedly been skirting the export ban put in place by the previous administration—with the tacit permission of the current administration.

The problem now is the very public optics of that coming to light in the context of having an affair with a maybe spy.

Betelbuddy • today at 2:26 PM

Biggest valuation ever will turn into biggest investor lawsuit ever. The music on the AI circular deals is about to be broken by a feminine spell. This has Lord of the Rings all over it...

NVDA at $151 right now...I never expected to see the day...

michelvocks • today at 2:10 PM

I just find it weird that trump loses the midterms and suddenly this happens. Might be a coincident but feels very sus.

martiverse • today at 2:49 PM

Did your TV tell you that? I hope you realize that there is absolutely no proof of the import ban having been skirted. The FBI has been investigating Alice Huang and Megaspeed since 2024 and all they have is a few GPUs still being unboxed at their Malaysian data center.

gabucino • today at 3:11 PM

>I'd love to be wrong

wong?

dyauspitr • today at 2:38 PM

It’s not the side chicks, it’s the side chips.

Roark66 • today at 2:48 PM

Well, you say that, but the perception is he hasn't got sacked for circular financing, nor for the providing of sanctioned components (supposedly they went to third countries, not China, so legal). But he got sacked for two affairs.

This seems very silly.

In all likelihood he got sacked for all those things, the affairs just were a convenient excuse.

What board would admit two thirds of their revenue is imaginary money. It's much better to sack a CEO for being "unfaithful to his wife".

uncivilized • today at 3:04 PM

How naive do you have to be to believe that Congress actually cares about that? They don’t care and happily watch their shares rise in price.

If the second affair didn’t come out, this wouldn’t be a discussion.

🔗 View 19 more replies