logoalt Hacker News

medler • today at 6:19 PM • 2 replies • view on HN

It is no more confusing than the naming schemes used by OpenAI and Anthropic


Replies

jug • today at 6:26 PM

OpenAI is at least arranged by size of celestial feature. Anthropic did arrange them by size of a written work. But I think Fable and Mythos made it a little weird. As for Google, no idea other than Hydrogen is small so at least that kind of tracks.

Having said this, I don't defend this trend at all and also think a model picker ought to be good enough with at most three tiers rather than five or so with sometimes like five effort levels each for 25 combos. I refuse to believe we need this granularity.

techmunky • today at 6:39 PM

OpenAI - Celestial body size.

Anthropic - Literary scale.

Google - random elements with no clear relation to model value/capacity.

➕ show 1 reply