Delusional perspective. He did not actually do this, even though the voters gave him a mandate to do it during his first term ("Lock her up!"), and the number of and the content of bizarre prosecutions aimed at him after he left office popularized a new word in the English language: "lawfare." The public's disgust at it gave him a second split term, which hadn't happened before in US history.
He's as corrupt as can be, but the Democrats have been doing nothing but calling for his investigation, investigating him, and changing laws so he can be prosecuted for about a decade now LOL.
You wrote:
"He's definitely corrupt"
AND
"Democrats have been unfairly investigating him"
in a single sentence. I cannot fathom this.
If he's corrupt, how are Democratic investigations of him unjust? What are they supposed to do instead?