> But what if the desire is not to harm some obnoxious company, but instead to reduce their influence in the market?
I don't see the difference. How would you reduce their influence without harming them?
I was challenging the assertion that buying and freeing is better than not engaging at all. I think the better comment would have been to indicate there is not likely a general rule. Devils and details and all that.
I was challenging the assertion that buying and freeing is better than not engaging at all. I think the better comment would have been to indicate there is not likely a general rule. Devils and details and all that.