logoalt Hacker News

plipt • yesterday at 10:48 PM • 4 replies • view on HN

Surprised at how garbled many of these transmissions come across.

I can barely understand 50% of what is being said and am impressed by these professionals who can.

Are the transmissions still analog for security / interoperability reasons?


Replies

keito • yesterday at 11:08 PM

Also, the recordings you hear online will often be more garbled (weaker signal) than what you hear in the cockpit or what ATC hears, because (1) in the air you have clear line of sight to the ground transmitter and to other planes, and (2) ATC has receivers that are designed to be able to cover the area they're controlling.

mmaunder • yesterday at 10:50 PM

Ah this is such a hot debate in the community. Yes it's straight up AM simplex and the argument for is: With AM when you step on another tx it screeches. Also pilots can hear pilots to improve situational awareness vs duplex which would have pilots only hearing ATC. Huge legacy fleet of aircraft. Cost to upgrade anything in a certified aircraft. There are so many arguments for digital though. it's a tough one.

ultrarunner • yesterday at 11:05 PM

You get used to it. There's like three things you're likely to hear based on context, and deciding which one it was isn't too difficult. Discerning additional detail and nuance (left/right on course) then becomes a much lower cognitive load. It is definitely a learned skill, but it comes automatically with time.

poszlem • yesterday at 11:35 PM

You can still understand a noisy analogue transmission. With digital you get it or you don't.

➕ show 1 reply