logoalt Hacker News

jacquesm • today at 7:44 PM • 1 reply • view on HN

That's an important bit of information that probably should make it into the blog, and I hope you guys made the right call, but I think that that is probably not the case. Best of luck.

oh: "What isn’t mentioned in the analysis is that we ran a System 1 decision model on each dataset to determine whether it contained privacy-sensitive data."

I hope at least that that was a local model. If not you've made things considerably worse.


Replies

neathack • today at 7:57 PM

It’s mentioned in the Handelsblatt article linked in the blog post. Since the lawyer was brought in by the newspaper, we didn’t mention their involvement in the post.

All LLM-based analysis was performed using local models, specifically the "elephant-1" model on our local RTX Pro 4000 SFF.

I respect your insistence on proper data handling -- you’re right in doing so -- and we tried to be as careful as possible when conducting the analysis.

Now let’s hold Lovable to the same standard.

➕ show 1 reply