Median performance? That's not a correct calculation.
To calculate proper stock returns you need weighted mean. Often in stocks you have a few outliers that give the vast majority of your profit.
I don't know if this is ignorance, but from a methodological standpoint this seems like an attempt to deceive or hide data.
Even ignoring proper returns, corrupt trades would show up as outliers, so the only thing this analysis shows is that there are a lot of normal looking trades.
True, Im seeing that 10% of the intra day trades were were on companies that changed 5% of value that same day. I uploaded the raw data here if you want to check.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1PD84w61HrL1a6lyAMGCO...
I was puzzled seeing this, after many many reports of government officials having absurd 100-200% returns in their portfolio.
Plus the S&P 500 is not "the market". It's a subset of the total US market that usually performs pretty close to the total US market, but a few percent difference either direction in performance isn't unusual, especially over less than a year.
And I don't think equal weighted S&P 500 is sufficiently motivated.