logoalt Hacker News

kibwen10/01/20242 repliesview on HN

> Only if you try to package it and sell it en masse.

Ryujinx wasn't being sold, it was being given away for free.

> Someone else distributed a tool that can be argued as used to bypass copyright

By this logic your entire computer is a tool to bypass copyright. An emulator is just a virtual machine, it doesn't contain any games or other copyrighted material. They are legal, despite Nintendo's mafioso scare tactics.


Replies

matheusmoreira10/01/2024

> By this logic your entire computer is a tool to bypass copyright.

That is the logic of copyright monopolists.

Free computing is subversive. It has the power to wipe out their entire business model like it was nothing. They don't want that. That's why they sign deals with the likes of Intel and AMD so that our processors come pwned straight off the factory.

"Our" computers haven't been ours for a long time now. They hide secrets from us. They have "protected video paths", "remote attestation", "platform keys", etc. These are all tools the monopolists use to make "our" computers do their bidding. Run all programs, except the ones that affect our bottom line. We want to copy but monopolists say no, and our computers obey.

show 1 reply
johnnyanmac10/01/2024

"packaged and distributed en masses" is you want to be nitpicky. I don't get to get away with dealing illegal substances just because I give it away for free. Money simply puts a target on my back.

>your entire computer is a tool to bypass copyright

Reducto ad absurdum doesn't really work here. There are specific scopes and use cases taken into consideration when considering what tools or works are bypassing copyright. I cant claim Yuzu is the same as VMware in their use cases (especially when VMware had to work with Microsoft to have that be allowed. And why it can't legally distribute Mac OS Tom's freely).

show 3 replies