logoalt Hacker News

lupusreal11/07/20243 repliesview on HN

The only hard part of dealing with nuclear waste is the social aspect. If not for that, you can simply and safely dump it into the ocean. Water is excellent shielding and the amount of uranium/etc already dissolved in sea water is absurd. Put it in a stainless steel vessel first if you want most of it to decay before coming into contact with the water, but that's not even necessary.


Replies

perihelions11/07/2024

That doesn't really work because marine life is good at filtering and concentrating a subset of the elements that are in spent nuclear fuel. There are already ocean fish that are too poisonous too safely eat because of (coal-emitted) mercury pollution—and that's only 100,000 tons of mercury, total, in the history of human industry [0]. If you dig in to the hard numbers surrounding spent fuel, it's a much, much more toxic and difficult problem than mercury—diluting it in the oceans is a complete non-starter.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marine_mercury_pollution

show 2 replies
avery1711/07/2024

I really hope you aren't serious. Safe dry-cask storage on site is already a fantastic solution.

show 2 replies
lazide11/08/2024

They were referring to the Sun.