When I work on some ad hoc configuration format I usually end up with quite a family of different comment types. Disabled values and prose about values are are the core set, but there might also be different prose types to separate the intention for a certain value (authored by the one setting the value) from documentation about the purpose of the field (authored by the one introducing the option). Also a type for key value pairs that have not been consumed (perhaps because of a typo in the key), and another for pairs that are applied as default, but should not be explicitly in the config if you want to go with the new default of they change in a software update.

Yes, this is for situations where the config is two way, e.g. when a GUI can be used to set some values. But I find some of those features so useful that I might sometimes be tempted to write out a processed version of the file parsed even when there isn't anything like a configuration UI.

I wish languages adopted structured comments (as in, semantically applying to syntax tree nodes rather than lines) more broadly. It used to be a thing in some early PLs but has mostly died out.