logoalt Hacker News

Panzer04yesterday at 6:40 AM7 repliesview on HN

Why bother building a better home when it's cheaper to buy insurance and rebuild later?

This is why prices are important - sometimes it's sensible to build cheaper houses without these safeties if the risk isn't there, but if the risk does exist then it needs to be priced right to provide that incentive.


Replies

vascoyesterday at 10:10 AM

The key thing to understand is that you don't get to choose when the house gets destroyed or get advanced notice. Which means you might be in there, or your kids, or all your belongings. But yes, after you're dead in the rubble someone else can rebuild your house and it might be cheaper.

show 3 replies
Almondsetatyesterday at 8:35 AM

How about the cost of your life? If the house resists the earthquake and you are inside it, you don't die.

show 3 replies
miohtamayesterday at 7:44 AM

Maybe be there is no longer "cheap" and that's the issue

show 1 reply
poisonborzyesterday at 9:38 AM

Maybe people don't like to restart their lives like that if it's avoidable, even if it costs more.

bgnnyesterday at 10:59 PM

in case of earthquakes: to not to die.

conspyesterday at 7:51 AM

Only you also take into account your cheap home will likely accelerate the problem. Which never happens.

thisoneworksyesterday at 3:38 PM

Hah financialization strikes again. Try explaining this to a person from a third world country, they would say "what are you talking about". Also they would have better health care than your average American.