logoalt Hacker News

jMylesyesterday at 7:36 PM2 repliesview on HN

I'm kinda surprised the article doesn't mention (and I have no idea the feasibility of) a system that works in the opposite direction as well: somehow communicating via sound waves the speed, heading, and distance (maybe possible through some kind of doppler effect?) of a boat in such a way that whales will perceive and make themselves safe from collision.

Seems at least worth researching.

> Zitterbart’s aim is for ship captains to receive zero false alerts, so that every ping truly requires their attention. Removing human oversight risks flooding ship captains with false reports

This sounds great, as long as we're still on track for the whole "A computer can never be held accountable, therefore a computer must never make a management decision."

I don't want to be the one to explain to the whales, "No, look, it's not our fault that we killed your singing partner - the AI told us this was the correct route. See?"


Replies

gerdesjyesterday at 11:56 PM

"somehow communicating via sound waves the speed, heading, and distance ..."

You'll need to speak "whale" first with this awful scheme.

A small whale is a few tonnes in mass a large one can be 150 tonnes. That is very easy to detect via SONAR.

Funnily enough a few specialised Japanese and Chinese ships are capable of detecting whales with amazing accuracy to the point of delivering small warheads.

show 2 replies
IncreasePostsyesterday at 9:04 PM

Would large whales even have the concept of "I need to get out of the way of this bigger thing"?

show 4 replies