Stop strawmanning.
No, there's no "wording" that gets you off the hook. That's the point. It's a question of design and presentation. Would a legal "Reasonable Person" seeing the site know it was another site's info, e.g. literally showing the site in an iframe, or is google presenting it as their own info?
If google is presenting the output of a text generator they wrote, it's easily the latter.
>Stop strawmanning.
Nice try, but asking a question confirming your opponent's position isn't a strawman.
>No, there's no "wording" that gets you off the hook. That's the point. It's a question of design and presentation. Would a legal "Reasonable Person" seeing the site know it was another site's info, e.g. literally showing the site in an iframe, or is google presenting it as their own info?
So you want the disclaimer to be reworded and moved up top?
Exactly. This is the consequence when search engines cut out all the sites they used to send traffic to and instead present AI summaries as their own seemingly-authoritative content in order to keep the user from leaving. If you provide material in a way that your users trust, then you have to back it up. The alternative is to make sure that your users don’t trust it (and thus are disinclined to use it).