logoalt Hacker News

jeffrallenyesterday at 9:07 AM4 repliesview on HN

Wish we were talking about making Fil-C required for apt, not Rust...


Replies

phicohyesterday at 9:40 AM

Those seems to be independent issues. Fil-C is about the best way to compile/run C code.

Rust would be about what language to use for new code.

Now that I have been programming in Rust for a couple of years, I don't want to go back to C (except for some hobby projects).

show 1 reply
dontlaughyesterday at 11:32 AM

Fil-C is slow.

There is no C or C++ memory safe compiler with acceptable performance for kernels, rendering, games, etc. For that you need Rust.

The future includes Fil-C for legacy code that isn’t performance sensitive and Rust for new code that is.

show 4 replies
lucyjojoyesterday at 11:39 AM

doesnt it only work on x86_64?

oddmiralyesterday at 11:26 AM

I wish, we will have something like Fil-C as an option for unsafe Rust.

show 2 replies