Besides the fact that this article is obviously AI generated (and not even well, why is there mismatches in british/american english? I can only assume that the few parts in british english are the human author's writing or edits), yes "overutilization" is not a real thing. There is a level of utilization at every price point. If something is "overutilizated" that actually means it's just being offered at a low price, which is good for consumers. It's a nice scare word though and there's endless appetite at the moment for ai-doomer articles.
Author here, I mix up American and British English all the time. It's pretty common for us Brits to do that imo.
See also how all (?) Brits pronounce Gen Z in the American way (ie zee, not zed).
> why is there mismatches in british/american english
You sometimes see this with real live humans who have lived in multiple counties.
> why is there mismatches in british/american english
Some people are not from usa or England.
By this logic loss leaders to drive out competition are good gor the consumer, no?
To be honest it doesn't feel manually edited.
Bullet points hell, a table that feels it came straight out of grok.
One of my least favorite things to come from AI is labelling any writing someone doesn't like as "obviously AI generated". I've read 3 of these kinds of comments on HN just today.