logoalt Hacker News

9rxlast Sunday at 9:04 AM3 repliesview on HN

But as the parent comment suggests, if the adults were getting sick it is unlikely that they would be able to:

* Produce 5 kids in the first place.

* Take care of the kids that they were able to produce, making survival of even half them much less likely.

But in actuality, best we are able to determine hunter-gathers who made it into adulthood lived longer, healthier lives than those in agrarian lifestyles.


Replies

integralidlast Sunday at 10:38 AM

They were getting sick and died more often than us, but still enough survived to keep the population alive. There's no contradiction.

I admit they probably had a stronger immunologic system on average, by virtue of relying on it and "exercising" more often. Alternatively, people prone to getting sick just died early.

show 1 reply
throw0101alast Sunday at 12:57 PM

> Take care of the kids that they were able to produce, making survival of even half them much less likely.

H-G societies tend to be smaller groups where everyone in the village helps with childcare, so if a parent was out of action for a while the children could still be gathered.

This is covered in the book Hunt, Gather, Parent by Michaeleen Doucleff, specifically with the Hadzabe people (Tanzania).

throwup238last Sunday at 12:11 PM

The adults getting sick and being undernourished was one of the leading causes of infant mortality.