Which would have made sense if company names were unique - which they aren't. See e.g. https://groups.google.com/g/mozilla.dev.security.policy/c/Nj... for an example of how this was abused.
It was used correctly. What CAs wanted to sell wasn't something browsers wanted to support, and EV was the compromise. It just happens that what EV meant wasn't that useful irl.
It was used correctly. What CAs wanted to sell wasn't something browsers wanted to support, and EV was the compromise. It just happens that what EV meant wasn't that useful irl.