logoalt Hacker News

dangalftoday at 1:16 AM7 repliesview on HN

Technically it is inefficiency. The electricity should be doing computer things. Heat is wasted electricity. Just there's not much the data centre could do about it.


Replies

stousettoday at 2:25 AM

Even if the computer does perfectly-efficient computer things with every Joule, every single one of those Joules ends up as one Joule of waste heat.

If you pull 100W of power out of an electric socket, you are heating your environment at 100W of power completely independent of what you use that electricity for.

show 7 replies
mr_toadtoday at 1:29 AM

There’s a minimum level of energy consumption (and thus heat) that has to be produced by computation, just because of physics. However, modern computers generate billions of times more heat than this minimum level.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landauer's_principle

show 1 reply
geoffschmidttoday at 1:22 AM

Heat is not by itself waste. It's what electricity turns into after it's done doing computer things. Efficiency is a separate question - how many computer things you got done per unit electricity turned into heat.

show 1 reply
anon84873628today at 5:41 AM

I think what they mean is that there is not a Carnot engine hooked up between the heat source and sink. Which theoretically something the data center could do about it.

charcircuittoday at 6:56 AM

The electricity is doing computer things, building bitcoin blocks.

YetAnotherNicktoday at 7:26 AM

No its not. It would be waste only if the there is a high temperature gradient, which is minimized in mining operation through proper cooling.

It's that computation requires electricity. And almost all of the heat in bitcoin mining comes from computation, technically changing transistor state.

sixtyjtoday at 6:53 AM

They could make a second floor with eggs and newborn chicken. /s