alt Hacker NewsThe problem is that it’s distracting, lowers the quality of the writing, and one has to be cautious that random details might be wrong or misleading in a way that wouldn’t happen if it was completely self-authored.
The problem is that it’s distracting, lowers the quality of the writing, and one has to be cautious that random details might be wrong or misleading in a way that wouldn’t happen if it was completely self-authored.
That's just not true, and even if LLMs did introduce more errors than humans, if you can't trust the author to proof read a summary article about his own papers, then you shouldn't trust the papers either.